User talk:Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V.

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V.!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Nice to see you here! Best --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 10:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Neue Kategorien bitte sachgemäß eintragen

Hallo liebe Freunde! Neue Kategorien wie gestern angelegte Category:DKW RT 175 in Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung bitte sachgemäß eintragen. Leider schaffe ich nicht mehr dabei hinterher zu kommen oder merke teilweise gar nicht welche Neuzugänge dort sind. Beispiel[1] einer von mir nachträglich ergänzten Kategorie.

Bitte mindestens ZWEI Kategorien eintragen:

• a) WTS-Kategorie nach Sachbezug
  • Hifestellung für die WTS-Kategorien ist hinterlegt auf: Category:Collections of the Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung Koblenz

• b) Allgemeinkategorie nach Inhalt in der Commonsstruktur
  • Die jeweils passende Allgemeinkategorie ergibt sich aus dem Inhalt. Meist kann man diese leicht über existierende Artikel oder die hiesige Suche ermitteln.

Leider ergibt sich zu diesen Neuanlagen[2] von Kategorien einiges an Nacharbeit. Sorry das muss bitte gemacht werden, ich schaffe es nicht mehr.

Dank vorab für die Mitwirkung! Grüße --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 09:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

File:TUPOLEV TB-3-SVENO scale modell in Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung Koblenz-Data.jpg

File:TUPOLEV TB-3-SVENO scale modell in Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung Koblenz-Data.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TUPOLEV TB-3-SVENO scale modell in Wehrtechni… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 23:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

File:British soldiers eating hot rations in the Ancre Valley during the Battle of the Somme.jpg

File:British soldiers eating hot rations in the Ancre Valley during the Battle of the Somme.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:British soldiers eating hot rations in the An… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 16:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Dear Belbury,

Sorry for that inconvenience and miscalculation. The rules are the rules. Otherwise the handling of copyrights concerning to Ernest Brooks is not simple:

• The copy of this picture, original in Imperial war Museum, is free under non-commercial use:[3]-> Copyright-Rules of IWM. Ok, non commercial doesn´t go with Wiki
• Otherwise Ernest Brooks worked as an press-officer for the UK-Forces in WWI and his works hade been published by the former UK-MoD.

The photo on the IWM website is described as:

Part of MINISTRY OF INFORMATION FIRST WORLD WAR OFFICIAL COLLECTION

Source:[4]https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205072579

Will mean, that this license could be adapted: -> PD-UKGov

• Also concerning Ernest Brooks in wikipedia.en other regulations are in use: Category:Ernest_Brooks. In conclusion the use in wikipedia.en is possible. Under this rule more than 1.200 pics of Brooks had been published.-> PD-US-expired-abroad

But the rules are the rules.

When I am 73 I´ll upload the picture again. :-)

Best regards

Felix

copy:@Ｔｏｍ Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V. (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

copy:@User:Sanandros kannst du bitte mal nachsehen, wer hier welche Bauchschmerzen hat? Bilder vom Verein kommen vom offiziell per OTRS in deːWP bestätigen Account der de:WTS:Koblenz und na klar, kann hier der user nur als natürliche Person eigene Bilder anfertigen und dann ggf. mit Erlaubnis des Vereins einbringen. Ich kann nur sagen das wir alles dafür getan haben, dass die Bilder der WTS lizenzkonform für Wikipedis gespendet werden können.Weitere "Strubbeligkeiten" sind echt nicht nötig, sorry schon klar, dass man das anders erklären kann. Für dich halt die Kurzversion mit der Bitte ggf. für Beruhigung zu sorgen. LG Ｔｏｍ (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Ändere es beim pic auf PD-UKGov dann ist der Grund für den LA nicht mehr vorhanden und man kann den Fall nach sieben Tagen schliessen.--Sanandros (talk) 06:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Sandbaer (talk) 07:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Mission Drone-Anti-Radar in Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung 2.jpg

File:Mission Drone-Anti-Radar in Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This photo is almost certainly not the work of the uploader, nor was it taken on December 7, 2024. The date listed is almost exactly 30 years after the DAR system was abandoned, and a cropped version of this photo was published in this 2023 Defence Express article, with the caption stating that the photo was taken during the 1980s. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

ZLEA _T\^C 19:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

This is NOT correct! The photo was taken in the Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung in Koblenz in the date published! Sandbaer (talk) 09:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

@ZLEA pls. revert your decision.

Did you note the comment "Archive photo credit: WTS" in the source you mentioned above ???

Please note for now and future cases:

The upload here is now the original from the officially ORTS registered WTS-Account. Regards --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Tom!ZLEA Had Not recognized, that the photo was taken in a Museum! Correct: It was taken 30 years after end of program. Regards Felix Sandbaer (talk) 13:14, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Tom! Everything is OK. We as Assosciation of Friends and Supporters of the Military Technology Collection has all rights of publication of pictures of our assets and own documentation. All pictures are OK and upload agreed! Best regards Felix Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V. (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

The photo was used in an article published a year before it was allegedly taken. I find it extremely hard to believe that DAR was still being launched as late as 2024, and have found no evidence of such. That said, I'm going to assume that the photo was taken in the 1980s, and the 2024 date was when it was scanned. In the US, scanning a photo does not mean you own the copyright of the copy, and I assume this is the same for Germany. If you want to upload the photo, you need to ensure that the original photo is free to use and upload it with the original copyright information. If the photo was taken by the German government, then it is free to use and should be uploaded with this tag. - ZLEA _T\^C 17:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Dear User:ZLEA, since you apparently did not understand the context, it seems to me that it is time to clarify this again.

• WTS is a government organization, pls. read the article de:Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung Koblenz.
• The image was uploaded by the official service-account of this organization.

In de:WP we support WTS and this account on many occasions, thus including in GLAM projects and at Wikipedia:QRpedia.

Now would you please be so kind and restore the image? If you have any further questions about the project, you can contact user:Sanandros here on commons or my disk in de:WP.

Thank you so much for the very pleasant cooperation. Greetings --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I understand that part. My point is that the image was improperly tagged and had an obviously incorrect date. If you want it restored, you will need to contact the admin who deleted it, in this case Yann. After it is restored, it will need to be properly tagged and dated to avoid further confusion. - ZLEA _T\^C 22:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V. (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

A German picture from the 1980s is not in the public domain, even if taken by an employee of the government. We need a formal written permission from the copyright holder via COM:VRT, who is usually the photographer, unless there was a written contract saying otherwise. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Sandbär, ein kleiner Tipp, das nächste mal auf der Disk von der File sich beschweren. Dann sieht der löschende Admin die Disk und wandelt es in ein DR um.--Sanandros (talk) 06:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Category:SEM 35

Category:SEM 35 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

unclear purpose

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

Rose Abrams (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Don´t understand the concerns! The category is named: „SEM 35 (Military Radio)“ Best regards Felix Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V. (talk) 10:47, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, the reason is that the category had an ambigious name that didn't clarify what it was meant to hold. I had no way of knowing that "SEM 35" was a military radio, nor that it was the same as "SEM 35 (Military Radio)". I have now corrected it though, so that "SEM 35" points to "SEM 35 (Military Radio)". Rose Abrams (talk) 11:12, 17 June 2026 (UTC)