Jump to content

Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Please ensure you have the FastCCI gadget enabled. You should use this to identify existing VIs with similar scopes. Note that if an image shows up as FP or QI it may also be a Valued Image.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
64,047 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 57,765 (90.2%) 
Undecided
  
 3,642 (5.7%) 
Declined
  
 2,640 (4.1%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mr.FarFar (talk) on 2026-09-06 01:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Jibla • Queen Arwa's palace • Queen Arwa mosque, Jibla – Queen Arwa's palace and the Queen Arwa Mosque in Ibb, Yemen.
Used in:
en:Palace of Queen Arwa • d:Q16642142 • Category:Jibla • Category:Queen Arwa's palace • Category:Queen Arwa mosque, Jibla
Open for review.

View
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2026-08-31 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Fireplace in Maison de l'Annonciation (Rodez)

in what way is this valuable please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 31 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-08-31 10:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Icons of princes of Yaroslavl, in the cathedral of the Dormition, Russia
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-08-31 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of Dormition Cathedral in Yaroslavl, plaque commémorative dédiée à Saint Tikhon
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-02 08:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Struthio camelus massaicus (Masai ostrich) female, rear view
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
004bvan (talk) on 2026-09-03 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Al-Biruni
Reason:
This language-independent image is a highly detailed, beautifully rendered artistic depiction of the prominent polymath and scholar Al-Biruni by polymath Muntadher Saleh. The artwork includes GPS EXIF data confirming its location at Expo 2020 in Dubai. It serves as an excellent and clear portrait for use across Wikimedia projects. -- 004bvan (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-03 13:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Campethera nubica nubica (Nubian woodpecker) female
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-03 13:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Cisticola chiniana victoria (Rattling cisticola)

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:50, 4 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-03 13:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Gyps rueppelli rueppelli (Rüppell's griffon vulture)

Great photo. But I'm not sure, if this one has the most value for this really broad scope. However, it appears to be the best valued in the scope of Gyps rueppelli rueppelli (Rüppell's griffon vulture), standing or even Gyps rueppelli rueppelli (Rüppell's griffon vulture) on the ground --MB-one (talk) 08:36, 4 September 2026 (UTC)reply

It is a crowded category, but I don't like the categories you propose. That would lead to thousands of new VI scopes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2026-09-03 15:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of an UB2X driving coach
Used in:
en:X 2000
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2026-09-03 22:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Sint Odulphuskapel in Grote of Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk (Dordrecht) - Oblique front view of the full chapel
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Mr.FarFar (talk) on 2026-09-04 03:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Mosque in Ibb – The Grand Mosque (Al‑Omari Mosque) and Al‑Asadiya Mosque and School in the Old City of Ibb.
Used in:
ar:الجامع الكبير (إب) • arz:الجامع الكبير (اب, اليمن) • ur:جامع الکبیر (اب) • d:Q16117761 • Category:Mosques in Yemen
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mr.FarFar (talk) on 2026-09-04 03:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Jibla, Yemen – historical architecture of the city and Queen Arwa's palace.
Used in:
Category:Jibla, Yemen • Category:Queen Arwa's palace
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2026-09-04 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Church tower, Firdgum Main entrance front side.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-09-04 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Purpuradusta gracilis (Graceful Cowrie), shell
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-04 08:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Le square Piquard, vue de la tour Nord-Est du Musée Ingres-Bourdelle
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-04 08:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Le faucon pèlerin par André Abbal - Musée Ingres-Bourdelle
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-04 08:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Lamprotornis purpuroptera purpuroptera (Rüppell's starling)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-04 08:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Pternistis squamatus maranensis (Scaly spurfowl)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-04 08:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Corypha africana tropicalis (Serengeti rufous-naped lark)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2026-09-05 02:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Meerdervoortkapel in Grote of Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk (Dordrecht) - Oblique front view of the full chapel
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-09-05 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Clausinella fasciata (Banded Venus), juvenile, left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-05 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de François-Marius Granet à Rome - Musée Granet
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-05 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Le 'Pont Vieux' vu depuis la tour Nord-Ouest du musée Ingres Bourdelle, Montauban France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-05 07:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Bycanistes brevis (Silvery-cheeked hornbills) pair; male (left) female (right)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-05 07:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Myrmecocichla nigra (Sooty chat) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-05 08:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Aquila rapax (Tawny eagle)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
ROCKY (talk) on 2026-09-05 14:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Panna Ghosh
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2026-09-05 16:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Spitz, Lower Austria − view from the north
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
1timeuse75 (talk) on 2026-09-05 12:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Guy Standing (economist)

no reason to choose this over other images in the category. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 5 September 2026 (UTC)reply

@Charlesjsharp: Where do i begin? This is a well composted photograph of economist Guy Standing. This image has been used in many outlets including Business Insider. Since 2015, the image as become a viral internet meme due to a related controversy over its Wikipedia caption, which has also received press coverage.[2][3][4][5] While the image was changed just this year, this version of the image was used as the main infobox image for the longest time. See here. -- 1timeuse75 (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-09-06 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Pollicaria rochebruni, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-06 09:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Tockus deckeni (Von der Decken's hornbill) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-06 09:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Burhinus vermiculatus vermiculatus (Water thick-knee)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-06 09:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Creatophora cinerea (Wattled starling) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-06 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Le plan d'eau de la place nationale, Montauban France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-06 05:36 (UTC)
Scope:
'Mariouccia' Modèle posant pour le portrait de 'Madame de Senonnes' - Musée Ingres Bourdelle de Montauban
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-09-07 07:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel Romagnant in Douai – France, exterior from the southwest
Reason:
Classified as a historical monument -- JackyM59 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-09-07 15:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Celtic torque from the Asnapio Museum, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, (France)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-09-07 15:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Coins of Vercingetorix, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, (France)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-09-07 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Gold coins of the Parisii, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, (France)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2026-09-07 18:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen ID.Polo - left front view
Used in:
de:VW ID. Polo, de:VW Polo, de:Volkswagen, de:Modularer E-Antriebs-Baukasten, de:Kleinwagen
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-09-07 18:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Former Capuchin convent in Douai – France, exterior from the northeast
Reason:
Classified as a historical monument -- JackyM59 (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2026-09-08 03:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Aerial view of Duggirala, Eluru district
Reason:
best in scope -- iMahesh (talk)

Heads up: on September 8, 2026, at 03:20, you entered 7 images into the competition. You can only submit 3 per day. Please remove 4 images; you can enter them into the competition later. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply

@Archaeodontosaurus: ✓ Done iMahesh (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2026-09-08 03:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Pavilion of the Enlightened (Mueang Boran)
Reason:
best in scope -- iMahesh (talk)

Heads up: on September 8, 2026, at 03:20, you entered 7 images into the competition. You can only submit 3 per day. Please remove 4 images; you can enter them into the competition later. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2026-09-08 03:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Replica of Prasat Sikhoraphum (Mueang Boran)

Heads up: on September 8, 2026, at 03:20, you entered 7 images into the competition. You can only submit 3 per day. Please remove 4 images; you can enter them into the competition later. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2026-09-08 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Church tower, Firdgum Front and left side.

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-09-08 05:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Naria lamarckii (Lamarck’s Cowrie), shell
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-08 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de Charles Quint, XVIe - Musée Ingres Bourdelle
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-09-08 05:45 (UTC)
Scope:
'Pont neuf' vu du 'Pont vieux' - Montauban
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-09-08 07:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Augustin Boutique-Grard Photo Library – France, exterior from the south
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-09-08 10:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Cyclopoma fossil vu au Fossilium 2015, Villeneuve d'Ascq (Fr)
Used in:
fr:Fossilium
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-08 13:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Eupodotis senegalensis erlangeri (White-bellied bustard) male (on left)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-08 13:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Dinemellia dinemelli boehmi (White-headed buffalo-weaver)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-09-08 13:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Eurocephalus ruppelli (White-rumped shrike)
Open for review.

I have added the following to the VI Nomination ProcedureːPlease ensure you have the FastCCI gadget enabled. You should use this to identify existing VIs with similar scopes. Note that if an image shows up as FP or QI it may also be a Valued Image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)reply


</noinclude>

Closed valued image candidates

[edit]


Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Scope

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
AntanO on 2015-04-14 16:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Cisticola juncidis (Zitting Cisticola)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)reply

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Paramanu Sarkar (talk) on 2026-08-04 05:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Cisticola juncidis (Zitting Cisticola)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=1198819023"