Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. AI-generated imagesEntirely or substantially AI-generated images are not eligible for featured picture status. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:54:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
Info 360 Panorama of Hyderabad City, can be viewed in panoviewer, Uploaded and Nominated by iMahesh (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Question Why is there that horizontal gradient bar at the top? -- Esniom (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2026 at 11:08:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info created and uploaded by Aneta p – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 11:08, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:08, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jakubhal 12:40, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Question Amazing colours. Does the lens produce the foreground distortion? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:03, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good colours. -- Esniom (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2026 at 09:55:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Question How would it look with a half crop of the trees on the right, putting the fountain in the middle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Done Good idea --Llez (talk) 11:02, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good after the crop. -- Esniom (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2026 at 10:24:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Gyps
Info Both vulture species are Critically Endangered. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 09:57, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:59, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2026 at 07:25:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Trees
Info created by Esniom – uploaded by Esniom – nominated by Esniom -- Esniom (talk) 07:25, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Esniom (talk) 07:25, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2026 at 04:27:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Psathyrellaceae
Info Coprinellus disseminatus fee inkcap Location: Voorsterbos Mushroom Reserve. What I find attractive are the diagonal lines.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:26, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Esniom (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice eye and composition. --JackyM59 (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 10:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Jaguar crossing the river in Encontro das Águas State Park Photos by Giles Laurent
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 19:55:30 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Arriving at the river
-
Entering the river
-
Looking around before crossing
-
Crossing the river by swimming
-
Walking in the water in direction of the shore
-
Exiting the river
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Panthera_onca_(Jaguars)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:55, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:55, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:55, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:26, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 10:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 10:40, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jakubhal 12:40, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 19:26:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles
Info A DFS train with the Locomotive 64 491 (built in 1940) coming from Behringersmühle in front of the Wiesent bridge. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support – Nice composition. —Bruce1eetalk 07:09, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Esniom (talk) 08:33, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:00, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 19:26:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Frescos_and_murals
Info Fresco in the vault of the main staircase of the Monastery of San Lorenzo de El Escorial. The painting belongs to a cycle of frescos entitled The Triumph of the Spanish Monarchy by Luca Giordano painted between 1692 and 1693. It's considered one of the most important series of frescos of the italian Baroque. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Some CA at the windowsills but very good.--Ermell (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
- Gone, thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:09, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Esniom (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:00, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 17:35:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Hesperiidae#Genus_:_Atalopedes
Info Male huron sachem (Atalopedes huron). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:35, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:35, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:23, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 10:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:00, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 16:12:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Sterna
Info We have two recent FPs of the common tern flying with a fish (though not a red one). All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- --Don (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:29, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Pierre André (talk) 08:12, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:00, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 10:02:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:02, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:02, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- --Don (talk) 17:29, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:30, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:09, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:38, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:04, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Esniom (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:59, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jakubhal 12:41, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2026 at 08:16:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Azimronnie – uploaded by Azimronnie – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 08:16, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 08:16, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:58, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 01:47, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:05, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jakubhal 12:41, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 19:39:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Valencian_Community
Info The hill with the Castillo De Almenara castle and surrounding peaks during sunset, Almenara, Spain. All by Krigore (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Krigore (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support But I'd remove the birds --Llez (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
File:Bous al carrer - vesprada de vaques, Festes d'Estiu de la Platja Casablanca, Almenara, 2026.jpg
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 18:41:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Sports#Individual_sports_including_animals
Info A cow facing a young man during a vesprada de vaques, part of the Bous al carrer festivities at the Festes d'Estiu de la Platja Casablanca, Almenara, Spain, 11 August 2026. All by Krigore (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Krigore (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 16:12:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxie
Info Andromeda Galaxy M31 hosting over a trillion stars, located 2.5 million light-years from Earth.
created by Luc Viatour (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC) – uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)[– nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Amazing. --Yann (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautifully detailed, with excellent clarity, natural colours, and an impressive level of detail. The dust lanes and the faint outer regions of the galaxy are particularly well captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support - Bien joué !!! - Benh (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:06, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:44, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 13:17:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Switzerland
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:17, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Not sure whether this should be in the "Rail vehicles" gallery or the "Bridges" gallery. I've used the "Bridges" gallery, but feel free to change. —Bruce1eetalk 13:17, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:17, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:58, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 19:34, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:35, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Pierre André (talk) 08:15, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 07:05:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Family_:_Accipitridae_(Buzzards,_eagles,_hawks,_sparrowhawks_and_kites)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:05, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:05, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:21, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Is it a juvenile? --Yann (talk) 15:59, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, this is a juvenile. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:35, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:33, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 01:47, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:17, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 10:26, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Spire of the Great Hall of Vajradhamma, Ancient City
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 02:14:08 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
North-side elevation of Spire of the Great Hall of Vajradhamma
-
South-side elevation of Spire of the Great Hall of Vajradhamma
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Thailand
Info created, uploaded & nominated by iMahesh (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support iMahesh (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:22, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:59, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:36, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Don (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:16, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2026 at 02:01:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info created by Fuad Al-Qrize – uploaded by Mr.FarFar – nominated by Mr.FarFar -- Mr.FarFar (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mr.FarFar (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Crop/compo problem. Also right hand is choped after elbow. Quality is good, shame. Mile (talk) 12:28, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Mile --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Good quality, but unfortunately the hand is cut off at the bottom. -- Esniom (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 22:05:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created by Ed.histoire – uploaded by Ed.histoire – nominated by Ed.histoire -- Ed.histoire (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 19:42:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Cândido Aragonez de Faria – uploaded by Hansmuller – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:42, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:42, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Mon, 14 Sep 2026 17:54:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Vatican City
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Quite good, but it would improve much by increasing brightness and contrast (believe me, I have tried...) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Done Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2026 (UTC)- Esqueci te falar para ficar a vontade de editar minhas fotos e subir uma nova versão em caso de achar melhor Wilfredor (talk) 23:31, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 02:21, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:20, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Case wanting 4/3 format. Mile (talk) 12:32, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 19:35, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 07:47, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 04:32, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:18, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 15:31:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Kazakhstan
Info created and uploaded by Ivan ideia – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 15:31, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 15:31, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Original, intriguing, beautiful composition --JackyM59 (talk) 16:10, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Per JackyM59 Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Quite good, despite simplicity. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 02:21, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:19, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Mile (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:41, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:32, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 07:47, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Most likely, the category coordinates for the village are incorrect (they are given for a village of the same name in a neighboring region) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
- No, that's my mistake. User usually uploads photos from Pavlodar Region, while this particular picture is from Karaganda Region. I haven't noticed it and expanded the description accordingly. Thank you for noticing. Красный wanna talk? 02:39, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful picture -- Esniom (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 13:37:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family_:_Syrphidae (Hoverflies)
Info Common long-bellied hoverfly (Sphaerophoria scripta) on a heath carnation (Dianthus deltoides). All by me -- Ermell (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:18, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 09:50:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
Info A favorite location of mine for landscape photography. Light was very special on that evening. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A fleeting light not to be missed --JackyM59 (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment A very nice view, somehow spoiled by the dark area in the foreground (fixable). I assume the softness in same parts is due to haze. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:16, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:43, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Mile (talk) 05:38, 7 September 2026 (UTC) p.S. Black areas are gaving contrast, and show photo was made at dusk/dawn, time for good photos.
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:29, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:22, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 08:36:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Czech Republic
Info created by A.Savin – uploaded by A.Savin – nominated by Phoenix CZE -- Phoenix CZE (talk) 08:36, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Phoenix CZE (talk) 08:36, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 08:20:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
Info A Czechoslovak LT vz. 38 (Panzer 38(t)) light tank in three-colour camouflage during a dynamic demonstration at the 29th BAHNA Land Forces Day. The photograph was taken on 23 June 2018 at Zadní Bahna near Strašice in the Rokycany District, Czech Republic. Developed by ČKD and adopted by the Czechoslovak Army in 1938, the tank was later produced for and operated by the German Wehrmacht as the Panzerkampfwagen 38(t). created by Adam Hauner – uploaded by RomanM82 – nominated by Phoenix CZE -- Phoenix CZE (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Phoenix CZE (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not enough information, either in the nomination or image file. The identification of the vehicle would be essential in a featured picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 07:04:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#France
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Fine light and natural colors. --Milseburg (talk) 09:54, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg; shows how to make most of a not-so-spectacular monument. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Good quality and interesting composition.--Apan (talk) 08:18, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful composition and colors -- Esniom (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 06:50:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Normandy
Info Mont-Saint-Michel with the rainbow, Normandie, France. Taken by Eric Kilby, uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 06:50, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 06:50, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A special situation at a frequently photographed location. --Milseburg (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful, and Kilby even went for the not-so-common view from the west, including less well-known items such as the Chapelle Saint-Aubert and the little wood on the northern slope. – Aristeas (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:47, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A wonderful moment captured. (But spots around the Mont Saint-Michel in the sky) --JackyM59 (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 08:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 19:35, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:45, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2026 at 06:51:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United Kingdom#Scotland
Info Autumn forest scene, Birks of Aberfeldy, Perth and Kinross, Scotland. Taken by Eric Kilby, uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 06:51, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 06:51, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support This landscape reminds me of the Hyrcanian forests along the southern shores of the Caspian Sea. The description could be improved. --IamMM (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent handling of the high contrast, good colours, and the long exposure shows a good balance (the water still looks like flowing water, not like fog or foam, as in many too-long long exposures). – Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A lovely autumnal scene full of nuances. --JackyM59 (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Question Isn't this tilted? Yann (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hello. In my eyes looks normal but I probably can't rule it out with certainty, since there are no obvious verticals or horizontals on the photo. Even so, a slight tilt here isn't as important as it is in architectural/urban photo. It wouldn't detract from the aesthetic value. The photo reminds me of the wall calendars that, by tradition, hang in the kitchen in my house. I think this photo would be a great illustration of October in a wall calendar. Юрий Д.К. 19:22, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the areas where the water doesn't flow should be horizontal. See note. It looks very unnatural like this. The more I look at it, the more I am convinced it is tilted. Please see File:Birks of Aberfeldy (55085667062), edit.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Important to correct the tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann: Much better indeed. Can you please merge the files? Or I should use it as alternative? I prefer merging as I still hope for 5-day promotion. Very good and difficult photo with a high aesthetic and educational value. Юрий Д.К. 09:37, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- OK, reuploaded over. Yann (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the areas where the water doesn't flow should be horizontal. See note. It looks very unnatural like this. The more I look at it, the more I am convinced it is tilted. Please see File:Birks of Aberfeldy (55085667062), edit.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hello. In my eyes looks normal but I probably can't rule it out with certainty, since there are no obvious verticals or horizontals on the photo. Even so, a slight tilt here isn't as important as it is in architectural/urban photo. It wouldn't detract from the aesthetic value. The photo reminds me of the wall calendars that, by tradition, hang in the kitchen in my house. I think this photo would be a great illustration of October in a wall calendar. Юрий Д.К. 19:22, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2026 at 17:21:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#France
Info Palais Bourbon, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:16, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:58, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:44, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:14, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support This is an obvious one. – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 16:19, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Of course! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 19:36, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:45, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support - very well done Poco! - Benh (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:31, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2026 at 17:02:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info created and uploaded by Abdelrahmannr – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Something new! Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting size comparison --Llez (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support I'm getting Dune vibes from this picture. --Phoenix CZE (talk) --Phoenix CZE (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment saw it before, shot is staged. I doubt it was free of charge. Becoming "pay per say". --Mile (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Also an interesting composition, actually emphasizing the height of these incredibly buildings. Very possible staged and paid, but this does not make the photo worse. (Painters have used paid models for ages, so what?) – Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Question Is there a hill to the north of the pyramids? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 10:08, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 19:37, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2026 (UTC)-- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:44, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support
- After closer inspection the foreground seems added because the delimitation with the background is strangely pixelated and it looks even more added for the horse as the borders of the subject are even much more pixelated. Compare the pyramid border with the horse borders and we see that an eraser tool was probably used around the horse, probably to delete the original surrounding background coming from another picture -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose until someone proves me the horseman wasn't photoshopped in. He looks much sharper than the surrounding jaggy hills. - Benh (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above. If the main component is not authentic, then there’s nothing really feature-able here. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:46, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment It is so dangerous to suggest a photo might be fake I contacted the nominator first. Three things make me suspicious. Firstly, the hill. The land to the north of the pyramids is flat as far as I can see online (and remember). Secondly, the scale. The rider seems far too distant relative to the pyramids. Thirdly, it was a misty day around the pyramids, but not where the rider is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2026 at 03:09:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info IC 443 (also known as the Jellyfish Nebula and Sharpless 248 (Sh2-248)) is a galactic supernova remnant (SNR)
created by Luc Viatour (talk) 03:09, 4 September 2026 (UTC) – uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 03:09, 4 September 2026 (UTC) – nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 03:09, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 03:09, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:08, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support per Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Another truly impressive image! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:29, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:14, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Respect... Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support ... and awe! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:34, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Do you mind including information about the palette (specifically, is it straight HOO did you use continuum subtraction to add narrowband to a broadband image)? This seems to be the former, but someone who isn't an astrophotographer may have a hard time telling. —brainandforce [yap] 06:13, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- I just added the info, it's an HOO color palette made with a dual-band HA and OIII 7nm filter. Luc Viatour (talk) 06:45, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks!
Support —brainandforce [yap] 21:14, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks!
- I just added the info, it's an HOO color palette made with a dual-band HA and OIII 7nm filter. Luc Viatour (talk) 06:45, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
File:Lakshmana Temple, Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh.jpg, not featured
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 12:07:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info created by StonesThatRemember – uploaded by StonesThatRemember – nominated by StonesThatRemember -- StonesThatRemember (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- StonesThatRemember (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Welcome to FPC, StonesThatRemember! I’m sorry to say so, but our rules state that only “[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote”. But you have only 17 edits yet, therefore we have to strike your vote. You can nominate images, though, and I am happy to state that you made everything right (it’s not uncommon that people have problems when creating their first nominations). Sorry again and all the best, – Aristeas (talk) 13:11, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: I thought that nominators can always vote for their own nominations. Has that changed? Yann (talk) 18:05, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann: This has not changed. I guess we understand the beginning of the voting rules in different ways. The second sentence runs: “Everybody can vote for their own nominations.” I assume you understand this as an exception to the rules from the previous sentence (“Editors whose accounts have at least …”), meaning that the minimum requirements don’t apply to nominators. I understand the second sentence differently: IMHO it just means that people can also vote for their own images and nominations (unlike e.g. on Commons:Valued image candidates, where “neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote”), but only if they are allowed to vote on FPC at all. So in your understanding the second sentence constitutes an exception to the first sentence; in my understanding the second sentence just refers to the general question whether people can vote for their own images/nominations or not, but does not limit the validity of the general rules from the first sentence … Actually the scope of the second sentence is ambiguous. I also see good reasons for a more restrictive interpretation (why all the repeated discussions about restricting voting to avoid misuse if people can easily evade all restrictions just by nominating images themselves?). However I am also happy with your more lenient interpretation, and I agree that the mere fact that the scope of the second sentence is ambiguous means that it’s better to allow the self-voting here and to move the question whether the second sentence actually constitutes an exception to the rules from the first sentence or not to a general discussion on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates, if somebody wants to open one. @StonesThatRemember Sorry for the inconvenience; I did not see that the cited second sentence from the rules is ambiguous and can be understood as constituting an exception; because of that ambiguity I should not have removed your vote. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 00:47:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Domestic dogs
Info created and uploaded by dllu – nominated by me —brainandforce [yap] 00:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support no Samoyed FPs yet, but I think this is worthy of being the first! —brainandforce [yap] 00:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support dllu (talk) 18:06, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:08, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very likeable dog portrait, the coat appears really fluffy, and the backlighting makes the hairs at the edges shine. – Aristeas (talk)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support I like how the top line of the background aligns right with the edges of the dog's size. --Wilfredor (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I understand it's part of the scene, but IMO the dark shadow band at the top is too visually distracting and takes away focus from the dog. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 15:09:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Containers
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Lacking wow, well below the bar of the FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Simple, but effective. --Yann (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 08:19, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support As Yann said. Please create the missing Category:St. Nicholas Church (Krstec). Quality deteriorates a bit towards the top and upper left edge (hence the ‘weak’), but decent. – Aristeas (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Done I've created the category and applied selective sharpening to the indicated area. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 14:44:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment I believe shooting from farther away or standing higher with a longer focal length would make the subject’s proportion looks more natural. -- Apan (talk) 07:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Chen-Pan Liao: I wanted to shoot from a position as farther away as possible, but this was the optimal one in the given conditions. The problem is that the church is located on a small elevated plateau, so moving backwards would mean going downhill. I'll try to correct the converging verticals so that it looks more natural. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Kiril. Thank you for your adjustments. I don't really mind the verticals, and now I understand the difficulty of shooting from a higher place. Apan (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Done I've uploaded a new version with corrected converging verticals. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:36, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Chen-Pan Liao: I wanted to shoot from a position as farther away as possible, but this was the optimal one in the given conditions. The problem is that the church is located on a small elevated plateau, so moving backwards would mean going downhill. I'll try to correct the converging verticals so that it looks more natural. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:17, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:07, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment I think, it is a bit overprocessed --Llez (talk) 07:31, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support maybe green CA on cross could be solved - sharpening artefact ? Mile (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Llez and PetarM: Thank you for your reviews. I've dealt with the noticeable white halo near the right edge of the dome and removed the green chromatic aberration around the cross. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:58, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:30, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 13:42:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A view of Hin Tha Toh on Koh Tao, Thailand, where dramatic rock formations meet the tropical sea. —kallerna (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent photo of the rocks, beautiful light and colours, and the couple at the bottom adds some life and works as a scale. – Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:19, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:30, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:30, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:14, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:46, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:53:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think this frontal view, taken from below makes full justice to this impressive sculpture. The statue also lacks contrast especially in front of this background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2026 (UTC) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support The base is integral to the original sculpture's location, and is seen from below as it appears to have been the creator's intention, and as the Louvre has placed it at the head of a flight of stairs. The background is what's there in the Louvre. The contrast between the sculpted form and the unsculpted stone behind is enough. Acroterion (talk) 17:24, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Acroterion --Llez (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:11, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:18, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Alt version
Info Based on Alvesgaspar comment --Wilfredor (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Also fine. Yann (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 06:46:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info Small basilica in Heraclea Lyncestis, setlement under Phillip II, father od Alexander the Great, Macedonia.-- Mile (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Одлично и доста инструктивно. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:30, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose High quality photo, little magic. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:39, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Indeed little magic, but especially useful and educative: we see the ground plan resp. a model of the basilica ruin and get a complete overview of the marble floor with its beautiful patterns, something which is possible only with the help of a drone shot. – Aristeas (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support per Aristeas --IamMM (talk) 07:25, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support --Pierre André (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 03:02:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created by Unknown author – uploaded by Abo Yemen – nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 03:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Can't see anything special in this photo, and the subject is not clear. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- It is just Muslim praying in the holiest place in the Islamic world… ★ 23:00, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Thank you for nominating this culturally significant and useful photo, but the composition apart from the people does not, to me, have the "wow' expected at FPC. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 01:35:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Jordan
(no idea which category to add)
Info created and uploaded by SinanDira – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 01:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support I propose FP gallery Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Jordan --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Funny picture, quality so-so. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:43, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Good example of animal abuse, something that surprised me was how smooth the tires are, even the reserve one. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:22, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 21:09:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Pulpit altar with organ in the Protestant church of St. George, Hattingen, Germany. A characteristic example of a classicist Kanzelaltar — the Protestant arrangement stacking altar, pulpit and organ on a single vertical axis, created here during the radical rebuilding of the medieval church in 1807–1810. The organ was built 1826–1830 by Christian Roetzel and restored in 2014; the altar painting shows the twelve-year-old Jesus in the Temple after Heinrich Hofmann. Above the case runs the inscription "Singet und spielet dem Herrn in eurem Herzen" ("Sing and make music to the Lord in your heart", Eph. 5:19)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality but not exceptional. The glare in the painting is a minus point. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Indeed a very distinguished example of a neoclassicist Kanzelaltar (well-preserved examples from that epoch are not very frequent in Germany), with delicate shades of light and shadows (kudos to the people who installed the tasteful lighting!), and a high-quality photograph. The glaring in the painting is indeed unfortunate, but at least it’s symmetric and does not hide the painting’s main subject, so IMHO tolerable. – Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:52, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:04, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Info I worked on the reflections. What do you think, Alvesgaspar also ping to the others voters: Llez, Aristeas, Radomianin, Agnes Monkelbaan, Юрий Д.К.. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:34, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment I'm happy with the improvement, even though the reflections didn't really bother me. They were simply part of the real conditions on site. For me, the focus is on the pulpit altar and the organ pipes as a whole, rather than on a detailed reproduction of the painting, so I think the reflections were tolerable. Anyway, thank you very much for taking the time to improve the image. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 20:58:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created by Lvova – uploaded by Lvova – nominated by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced composition and unexceptional subject in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support The composition makes the most of the gas pipeline with its impressive curves, which also nicely frame the building in the background. The slight unbalance could be improved by cropping ca. 460 pixels from the bottom, so that the gaps between the slabs meet at the bottom-right corner. Technical quality is decent, good for a smartphone and without extreme oversharpening etc. I just regret that the tree has been cut at the top, but this was probably hard to avoid. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you; cropped a little. Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:06, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. Impressive curves and rust aestetics are portrayed very well. —Rave (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose No magic, sorry! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Exactly, it is technique. Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:59, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support There is nothing special about this object itself, but I always like it when someone finds beauty in ordinary objects and tries to convey it through photography. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is just okay for QI, too generous bottom crop, OVERCAT (a classic...). --A.Savin 09:29, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Have to agree with the other opposers, sorry. An interesting rather than exceptional photograph. BigDom (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 07:04, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 20:56:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Abstract
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Rusty sheet pile wall at the historic harbour of Carolinensiel - Morning light brings out three contrasts: cold–warm between the bluish-black wall segment and the rust-orange piles; the railing's diagonal shadow grid across the vertical piles, ending in a shadow self-portrait of the photographer; and faint wave reflections casting moving light onto the static steel.
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's too clear that the silhouette is the photographer's. Quite a common capture, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Basile Morin. In the case here it was purely intentional to place myself at the end of shadow of the railing and barely over the water on the red metal surface - see also image description and nomination text. I made multiple attempts to fit my own shadow in a pleasing way here. Tuxyso (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support For me, the plan has succeeded.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm with Basile. Not special enough even without the shadow of the photographer. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:52, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Visually appealing to me, and I love the rich rust tones. – Aristeas (talk) 14:15, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 07:53:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Russian cruiser Aurora on Petrogradskaya embankment harbor to Saint Petersburg .- Russia created by Pierre André - uploaded by Pierre André - nominated by Pierre André Leclercq. --Pierre André (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Pierre André (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice perspective frame and beautiful definition for a 2012 photograph --JackyM59 (talk) 08:16, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Light is not so favourite. Would bet Exif isn't set. Hard light. Mile (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support 17:36, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Luc Viatour (talk)
Support per JackyM59.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support I love the fact that author have managed to capture the cruiser without the disturbing hotel building (the one with "Samsung" on it here) behind it. Glass one (Aurora residential complex) somehow looks not so disturbing as "Samsung" would be. Красный wanna talk? 08:18, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment This is too blue, white balance should be adjusted. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's good, but hardly among the very best "Aurora" photos, sorry. --A.Savin 09:33, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:29, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 06:01:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info Officer's Home in Bitola, Macedonia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 06:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perspective correction necessary --Llez (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Llez Good, which side ? Lamps or walls ? Somehow you will spoil one even further. Maybe to leave as it is, its drone shot. Mile (talk) 08:31, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Both. I did it for you. you can see the result here and download it, if you want. --Llez (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Ok Llez, you can upload it. Just keep same color space and full size. I had to view on smartphone. @Savčenko, i will try to find some more Category. --Mile (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Info I uploaded the version with corrected verticals --Llez (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Distorted verticals. Inevitable dynamic range limitations of a drone camera at nighttime. Poor categorization. --A.Savin 09:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support For the corrected version --Llez (talk) 05:41, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Quality is decent, if we consider the circumstances, and it’s certainly a charming scene with a little touch of magic. Thanks to Llez for the correction! – Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 21:09:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Arenaria (Scolopacidae)
Info Ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres), still mostly in breeding plumage. Rare for me to see them up close. This one was feasting on horseshoe crab eggs. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:09, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:09, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment The linked FP gallery Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Arenaria does not exist. Is Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Scolopacidae_(Typical_Waders) the correct gallery? --Tagooty (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I have corrected the link to the genus where we have two current FPs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. Not sure how I got it wrong. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 13:23, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I have corrected the link to the genus where we have two current FPs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A little boost in exposure and shadows would be nice I believe. -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:35, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Very nice and excellent detail for the bird. The out-of-focus foreground and background include some areas which are (more) in focus; therefore they look a bit patchy and distract from the subject. I guess you have cloned out something there. That’s fine, of course, but Adobe’s clone repair tool often fails to understand that it must take the patches from areas with the same level of details; in this case we need to move the clone source manually to an appropriate place (which is as much out of focus as the place where the patch gets inserted). If you could fix this, it would substantially improve the image. – Aristeas (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support- Thanks, though nothing is cloned/removed in this one. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:01, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks too, but then I am really curious about the reason for the variations in the out-of-focus areas. Was there something in between, e.g. some fence or grille? Was there some masking or noise removal? – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Oh I see what you mean. Yes, noise removal artifact. I'm on my way out to look for some other birds right now, but will fix that later today. — Rhododendrites talk | 11:12, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks too, but then I am really curious about the reason for the variations in the out-of-focus areas. Was there something in between, e.g. some fence or grille? Was there some masking or noise removal? – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, though nothing is cloned/removed in this one. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:01, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Excellent detail, but very similar pose etc to the two existing FPs. I find those to be more eye-catching. --Tagooty (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment New version uploaded, following Aristeas' and Paramanu Sarkar's suggestions - thanks! — Rhododendrites talk | 12:35, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Many thanks for the improvements, Rhododendrites – now it’s flawless! – Aristeas (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 20:27:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info artwork by sisters Jitka and Květa Válovy, photo & uploaded by Petr Vodička – nominated by Draceane — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:27, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice shot of an abstract artwork. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:27, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Kacir (talk) 22:17, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support JAn Dudík (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Neutral for me. I really like the pattern, so I don't want to oppose. The lower part is darker due to the surroundings outside the likely ground-level window (possibly shadows from another building), resulting in uneven illumination. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I also like the abstract pattern but illumination is really not ideal. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 06:22:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Nectariniidae_(Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- 800 mm none the less, great shot with wonderful detail. --Don (talk) 07:41, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice shot, but should identify as male and use it on a wiki. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have done it as you suggested. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:14, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice bird, I think this could take a bit of a crop though. BigDom (talk) 08:46, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I cropped out some of the extra space, hope you like it better now. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Good pose and colours. Detail could be better, and the wings/tail are blurry. --Tagooty (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Detail could be better but nice bird Юрий Д.К. 06:57, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:18, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Thu 03 Sep → Tue 08 Sep Fri 04 Sep → Wed 09 Sep Sat 05 Sep → Thu 10 Sep Sun 06 Sep → Fri 11 Sep Mon 07 Sep → Sat 12 Sep Tue 08 Sep → Sun 13 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sun 30 Aug → Tue 08 Sep Mon 31 Aug → Wed 09 Sep Tue 01 Sep → Thu 10 Sep Wed 02 Sep → Fri 11 Sep Thu 03 Sep → Sat 12 Sep Fri 04 Sep → Sun 13 Sep Sat 05 Sep → Mon 14 Sep Sun 06 Sep → Tue 15 Sep Mon 07 Sep → Wed 16 Sep Tue 08 Sep → Thu 17 Sep
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:September 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
